Production of 1TP3Q039; coal-fired electricity

How Europe cheats on coal-fired power generation


By dint of repeating that coal is a disastrous fossil fuel for the planet, world leaders seem to have finally understood. Coal has recorded a drop of 3 % in world electricity production. This figure is an average, with ups and downs depending on the country; the virtuous trend is driven by Europe, which posted a record drop of 19 % in the first half of 2019. Everything would therefore be fine if the British NGO Sandbag had only looked at the figures a little further than the tip of our nose. The reality is that Europe produces less coal-fired electricity but buys a lot more from countries just across the border. As if greenhouse gases stop at customs barriers!

Last year, coal experienced a historic decline to 3 % of global electricity generation. The European Union played a major role in this result: a drop of 19 % recorded in the first half of 2019, thanks in particular to Ireland (-79 %) and Germany (-22 %).

But this virtuous result is a decoy. EU countries would import more coal-fired electricity overall. Most of it would come from power stations in the Balkans, located just outside Europe's borders, reveals the British environmental NGO Sandbag. Its report shows that 21 TWh of electricity was imported from third countries, compared to only 3 TWh in 2017. These imports would have emitted around 26 million tonnes of CO2 in 2019, more than the annual emissions of Italy's coal fleet, the sixth largest in the EU.

European countries are reducing the share of coal in their electricity generation. This allows them to demonstrate cleanest behaviour to their increasingly green electorates. A virtuous conduct that does not come from a sudden burst of awareness of their environmental responsibility. These countries are giving up coal because it is expensive. Since the Kyoto Protocol came into force in 2005, the member countries of the European Union have been subject to the emissions trading scheme. In this market, the price of carbon is constantly rising: €20 per tonne in 2019. This additional cost was designed to encourage the development of renewable energies to the detriment of fossil fuels. In practice, however, this has led to a wave of coal-fired power plant construction just outside the EU's borders, mainly in the Balkans, in countries that tax little or no carbon emissions.

import coal EU

It is to these countries that Europe turns to supplement its energy supply. Dirty but low-cost electricity is sneaking into the European grids incognito. And at the rate at which some countries on the periphery of Europe are building coal-fired power plants, this supply is not about to stop. The NGO Sandbag estimates that 57 GW of coal energy could be injected into the European grid.

Why not enjoy unlimited reading of UP'? Subscribe from €1.90 per week.

coal injection into the European network

Only one measure could stop the development of this perverse practice: the introduction of a carbon tax at Europe's borders. This would make it possible to push less virtuous producer countries to adopt good environmental practices.

Some MEPs, such as Finland's Ville Niinistö, are in favour of introducing such a tax, which would push neighbouring countries to finally get on the road to renewable energy. Probably thinking of the gas of her big Russian neighbour, she says: "I'm not sure that we're going to be able to do that. In the EU we are clearly on the way to an electricity system based on renewable energies, and our neighbours should be too. If we introduce a border carbon tax on electricity, we would avoid exporting our emissions and bring our neighbours into the shift to renewables.

The President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, takes a very positive view of the introduction of such a measure. But the first sketches of the idea have reached the ears of Donald Trump, who, with all his bristling hair, made it clear that he was vehemently opposed to it. It must be said that the United States supplies nearly 17 % of the coal used in Europe.

Sources: Euractiv, Sandbag

Nous avons un message pour vous…

En octobre dernier nous avons pris l’engagement que UP’ Magazine accordera au dérèglement climatique, à l’extinction des espèces sauvages, à la pollution, à la qualité de notre alimentation et à la transition écologique l’attention et l’importance urgentes que ces défis exigent. Cet engagement s’est traduit par le partenariat de UP’ Magazine avec Covering Climate Now, une collaboration mondiale de 250 médias sélectionnés pour renforcer la couverture journalistique des enjeux climatiques.

Nous promettons de vous tenir informés des mesures que nous prenons pour nous responsabiliser à ce moment décisif de notre vie. La désinformation sur le climat étant monnaie courante, et jamais plus dangereuse qu’aujourd’hui, il est essentiel que UP’ Magazine publie des rapports précis et relaye des informations faisant autorité – et nous ne resterons pas silencieux.

Notre indépendance éditoriale signifie que nous sommes libres d’enquêter et de contester l’inaction de ceux qui sont au pouvoir. Nous informerons nos lecteurs des menaces qui pèsent sur l’environnement en nous fondant sur des faits scientifiques et non sur des intérêts commerciaux ou politiques. Et nous avons apporté plusieurs modifications importantes à notre expression éditoriale pour que le langage que nous utilisons reflète fidèlement, mais sans catastrophisme, l’urgence environnementale.

UP’ Magazine estime que les problèmes auxquels nous sommes confrontés dans le cadre de la crise climatique sont systémiques et qu’un changement sociétal fondamental est nécessaire. Nous continuerons à rendre compte des efforts des individus et des communautés du monde entier qui prennent courageusement position pour les générations futures et la préservation de la vie humaine sur terre. Nous voulons que leurs histoires inspirent l’espoir.

Nous espérons que vous envisagerez de nous soutenir aujourd’hui. Nous avons besoin de votre soutien pour continuer à offrir un journalisme de qualité, ouvert et indépendant. Chaque abonnement des lecteurs, quelle que soit sa taille, est précieux. Soutenez UP’ Magazine à partir d’1.90 € par semaine seulement – et cela ne prend qu’une minute. Merci de votre soutien.

Je m’abonne →

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Previous article

Should there be resource quotas per citizen?

Next article

These French banks that finance the destruction of the world's forests

Latest articles from Resources



Already registered? I'm connecting

Inscrivez-vous et lisez three articles for free. Recevez aussi notre newsletter pour être informé des dernières infos publiées.

→ Register for free to continue reading.



You have received 3 free articles to discover UP'.

Enjoy unlimited access to our content!

From $1.99 per week only.