If it challenges us, what does science fiction have to say? Like painting, is it "pure emotion" or "accumulation of meaning", or both? In what way does this modern imaginary allow us to translate reality (in the sense of Lacan and not Benveniste) into the "pure emotion" or "accumulation of meaning", or both?
Plus
In Misery of Historicism (1945), Karl Popper states: "The future course of history is unpredictable. "In "SF and Experimentation", Isabelle Stengers seems to argue the opposite (Hottois, Philosophy and SF, 2000). In "SF and Experimentation", Isabelle Stengers seems to argue the opposite (Hottois, Philosophy and SF, 2000).
Plus
"If science becomes fiction, it has to be the science of tomorrow, and that means that fiction can anticipate science. But if it is chained to the unleashing of science, it does not have the power to chain science, hence its lack of seriousness. "Nathalie
Plus
The fruit of a philosophical primer, to think "the crisis" by the O and briefly make it dialogue with the socio-economic crises of the capitalist world (cycle, structuring and conjuncture), the author ventures on the track of a mechanical word: obsolescence, which refers to the technical environment of man and qualifies it. After
Plus
You have received 3 free articles to discover UP'.
