GMO crops would flourish like never before.

GMO crops took the world by storm in 2016, after marking time for the first time in 2015, with an increase of 3% in planted area to 185.1 million hectares in 26 countries around the world. This is the claim of a report by ISAAA (International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications), a pro-GMO NGO funded in particular by the American group Monsanto. The report is widely controversial among opponents of GMOs who see it as a manipulation of the figures.
Photo: Greenpeace action against GMOs

L’ISAAA, which published this count, sees the increase in surface areas as confirmation of its verdict of a decline only " conjoncturel "in 2015, due" to low world commodity prices« . ISAAA's prediction that GMO plantings would increase again as soon as prices rise. came true« notes the NGO's annual report, " contrary to the propaganda of critics that biotechnology does not convince farmers« . In 2015, after 19 years of consecutive annual growth, the area cultivated with GMOs had decreased for the first time, by 1%, to 179.7 million hectares against 181.5 million in 2014, according to the 2015 ISAAA report.
In 2016, the United States continues to be the leading GMO country with 72.9 million hectares, followed by Brazil (49.1), Argentina (23.8), Canada (11.6), and India (10.8). Together, these five countries would account for 91% of the total area of GMO plantations.

Europe: 17% increase, but not everywhere

In Europe, the total area increased by 17% compared to 2015, i.e. a total of 136,363 hectares of MON 81 maize, marketed by Monsanto. This increase is significant only in Spain, which is becoming the leading European GMO planting country, with 95% of the EU's GM maize area (129,081 hectares), and the only one where areas are growing. The other countries are, according to the Citizens' Watch site infOGM...which is down significantly. This is particularly the case in the Czech Republic where, from an already derisory area, there is a sharp decrease (from 995 ha to 75 ha), as well as in Portugal (from 8017 ha to 7070 ha).
In Africa, only South Africa and Sudan planted 2.8 million hectares with GMOs last year, after a suspension in Burkina Faso and Egypt. Burkina Faso abandoned Monsanto's transgenic cotton introduced in 2008, claiming that it was not profitable, and that its fibre was becoming shorter and shorter and therefore sold cheaper on world markets.

READ IN UP' : How Monsanto's GM cotton has become a scourge for farmers in Burkina Faso

In Africa, ISAAA nevertheless highlights the progress made in research and the establishment of regulatory frameworks allowing GM crops: Kenya, Malawi and Nigeria have moved from the stage of "...the development of a new GM crop" to "...the development of a new GM crop"...". research » à « the granting of authorisation for release into the environment« and six other countries (Burkina Faso, Ethiopia, Ghana, Nigeria, Swaziland and Uganda)". are attempting to set up multi-location trials for commercial authorization," notes with satisfaction the organization..
In terms of genetically modified plant species, soya is the most widely distributed in the world, with 91.4 million hectares, or half of the world's GMO area. « On the GMO planet, transgenic soya is doing well, but cotton surfaces are breaking the camel's back. "says Christophe Noisette, host of the InfoGM website.

GMO cotton in decline

For India, ISAAA suggests a decrease from 11.6 to 10.8 million hectares of transgenic cotton in 2016. InfOGM states that " Bt cotton crops have been drastically reduced in favour of other crops and peasant and indigenous cotton varieties [1]. Isaaa reports a decrease from 11.6 million hectares in 2015 to 10.8 million hectares in 2016, which does not correspond to the Indian government's figures (10.6 million hectares to 8.5). Has Isaaa been confused with the total area under cotton? According to our government source, cotton acreage has indeed increased from 11.5 million hectares in 2015 to 10.2 million hectares in 2016. "
Last year, the value of the global market for genetically modified crops, estimated by Cropnosis, was $15.8 billion, up 3% from 2015. According to its website, the ISAAA, which has been conducting a census of GMO areas in the world since 1996, is funded by foundations and private donors, but also by the US Department of Agriculture and the Monsanto group, which is in the process of merging with the German giant Bayer.
Several organizations do not share advocacy pro domo from ISAAA. « This report does not mention at all the harmful effects of GMOs, even though the balance sheet is very negative, particularly in Latin America. ", indignantly told AFP Renée Velvée of the NGO Grain. Among them, he points out, " millions of displaced farmers, peasants murdered because they defended their land against industrial soy monoculture, millions of hectares of native forest destroyed in Brazil, and the unbridled development of livestock farming that fuels global warming, not to mention the cancers linked to the massive use of herbicides.
Source: AFP, InfOGM

Nous avons un message pour vous…

Dès sa création, il y a plus de dix ans,  nous avons pris l’engagement que UP’ Magazine accordera au dérèglement climatique, à l’extinction des espèces sauvages, à la pollution, à la qualité de notre alimentation et à la transition écologique l’attention et l’importance urgentes que ces défis exigent. Cet engagement s’est traduit, en 2020, par le partenariat de UP’ Magazine avec Covering Climate Now, une collaboration mondiale de 300 médias sélectionnés pour renforcer la couverture journalistique des enjeux climatiques. En septembre 2022, UP’ Magazine a adhéré à la Charte pour un journalisme à la hauteur de l’urgence écologique.

Nous promettons de vous tenir informés des mesures que nous prenons pour nous responsabiliser à ce moment décisif de notre vie. La désinformation sur le climat étant monnaie courante, et jamais plus dangereuse qu’aujourd’hui, il est essentiel que UP’ Magazine publie des rapports précis et relaye des informations faisant autorité – et nous ne resterons pas silencieux.

Notre indépendance éditoriale signifie que nous sommes libres d’enquêter et de contester l’inaction de ceux qui sont au pouvoir. Nous informerons nos lecteurs des menaces qui pèsent sur l’environnement en nous fondant sur des faits scientifiques et non sur des intérêts commerciaux ou politiques. Et nous avons apporté plusieurs modifications importantes à notre expression éditoriale pour que le langage que nous utilisons reflète fidèlement, mais sans catastrophisme, l’urgence écologique.

UP’ Magazine estime que les problèmes auxquels nous sommes confrontés dans le cadre de la crise climatique sont systémiques et qu’un changement sociétal fondamental est nécessaire. Nous continuerons à rendre compte des efforts des individus et des communautés du monde entier qui prennent courageusement position pour les générations futures et la préservation de la vie humaine sur terre. Nous voulons que leurs histoires inspirent l’espoir.

Nous espérons que vous envisagerez de nous soutenir aujourd’hui. Nous avons besoin de votre soutien pour continuer à offrir un journalisme de qualité, ouvert et indépendant. Chaque abonnement des lecteurs, quelle que soit sa taille, est précieux. Soutenez UP’ Magazine à partir d’1.90 € par semaine seulement – et cela ne prend qu’une minute. Merci de votre soutien.

Je m’abonne →

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Previous article

Mineral oils: a real health hazard

Pascal Canfin
Next article

Pascal Canfin: "CAP, the reform of the last chance"

Latest articles in Food Security and Agrostrategies



Already registered? I'm connecting

Inscrivez-vous et lisez three articles for free. Recevez aussi notre newsletter pour être informé des dernières infos publiées.

→ Register for free to continue reading.



You have received 3 free articles to discover UP'.

Enjoy unlimited access to our content!

From $1.99 per week only.